Data privacy regulations

This is engineering guidance for the obligations behind your privacy controls; it is NOT legal advice. Map which regimes apply from user geography and the data you collect, then confirm a lawful basis before any personal data is collected. Consult counsel for binding interpretation.

Core regimes (as of 2026)

Regime Scope Lawful-basis model
GDPR (EU/EEA) EU/EEA residents' personal data Requires one of six named bases (consent, contract, legal obligation, vital interests, public task, legitimate interests)
UK GDPR + DPA 2018 UK residents Mirrors GDPR post-Brexit
CCPA/CPRA (California) CA residents; only state law also covering employees and B2B contacts Notice-at-collection + opt-out of sale/share; no consent-first gate
Other US state laws 20 states in effect by 2026 (e.g., VA, CO, TX, CT; IN/KY/RI live Jan 1 2026) Mostly VA-template: opt-out + opt-in for sensitive data
  • You MUST NOT assume a single regime covers all users — most products are multi-jurisdictional.
  • Treat the US state landscape as a moving target: pin your applicability matrix to a dated revision and SHOULD re-check quarterly. Federal court injunctions and new effective dates change the picture (forecast: more states will join through 2026–2027).

Shared principles to encode

These appear across GDPR and most US state laws, so build to them once:

  • lawful basis: You MUST establish and record a lawful basis (GDPR) or required notice/opt-out posture (US) before collection.
  • data minimization: You MUST collect only data needed for the stated purpose. Default to not collecting.
  • purpose limitation: You MUST use data only for the purposes disclosed at collection. New purpose requires new basis/notice.
  • storage limitation: You MUST define retention per data type and delete or anonymize when it expires.
  • transparency: You MUST disclose what is collected, why, and with whom it is shared, in plain language at the point of collection.
  • data subject rights: You SHOULD design for access, correction, deletion, and opt-out from the start (see agenticdevelopercookbook://guidelines/planning/security/privacy-by-design).

Controller vs processor

  • Controller (GDPR) / business (CCPA): decides why and how data is processed; owns the lawful basis and most rights obligations.
  • Processor (GDPR) / service provider (CCPA): acts only on documented instructions from the controller.
  • You MUST identify which role each system plays before design. Processor relationships MUST be governed by a written data processing agreement (DPA).

Before you collect

  1. Determine applicable regimes from user geography and data types (special-category/sensitive data raises the bar).
  2. Confirm a lawful basis or required notice/opt-out posture — and record it.
  3. Confirm minimization, retention, and a deletion path exist for each field.
  4. You SHOULD consult counsel for binding interpretation; agents MUST NOT treat this guideline as legal sign-off.
version
1.0.0
tags
privacy, compliance, gdpr
author
Mike Fullerton
modified
2026-06-09
references
gdpr-info.eu

Change History

Version Date Author Summary
1.0.0 2026-06-09 Mike Fullerton Initial creation